AI
2026-11-07
OpenAI's finance chief, Sarah Friar, went on CNBC Friday and said something blunt. Her company is not slowing down on data centers. Two days earlier, voters across the country had rejected ballot measures tied to those same data centers. Texas, Illinois, and other states pushed back hard. Friar's message: the backlash won't change OpenAI's plans.
The fight is really about who pays. Data centers use huge amounts of electricity and water, and nearby residents often see their utility bills climb first. That's why so many of Tuesday's votes broke against the industry. But OpenAI, like most AI companies, says it has no choice. It needs more computing power to keep up with demand for its products. Local anger and corporate urgency are now pulling in opposite directions, and neither side is backing down yet.
Will voters' anger actually slow construction? Probably not right away. Most of these projects are already permitted and under contract. But state lawmakers elected this week could write new rules. They could target water use, tax breaks, or who pays for new power lines. If enough states do that, building AI data centers in the US could get pricier. Some companies might look overseas instead.
This story is written by AI from the sources above, checked against them before publishing. If something here still reads wrong, tell us and we'll correct it.